top of page

Why a Market Correction Looks Closer Than You Think — and What Could Trigger It

Aug 18

6 min read

Ben Rowan

Thesis. Markets can correct without a recession and often do when valuations stretch, leadership narrows, volatility sits at low levels, and credit spreads stay overly calm. Those four conditions are visible now in the U.S. and, to a milder extent, in Australia. A baseline correction of 10–15% in the next 3–9 months is plausible. A deeper 20–25% drawdown would likely require either an earnings disappointment in Big Tech or a policy shock that lifts real yields or widens credit spreads. A 2008-style crash is unlikely because household and bank balance sheets are much stronger, and the U.S. banking system has just passed severe stress tests with ample capital (Federal Reserve, 2025; Reuters, 2025).


ree

1) What people are saying now (and whether 2008 is a fair comparison)


Valuation and earnings. The S&P 500 forward 12-month P/E sits around 22, above the 5-year and 10-year averages, while 2025 earnings growth expectations remain about 10% (FactSet, 2025). Bulls argue earnings have surprised positively this season and recession chatter on earnings calls has collapsed, which supports the tape (WSJ, 2025; FactSet, 2025). Bears counter that high multiples leave “unfriendly asymmetry” where upside is incremental but downside accelerates if anything disappoints; major sell-side houses are neutral equities and explicitly recommend hedges (MarketWatch, 2025; Goldman Sachs, 2025).


As per the chart listed below, an average of 4% across all sectors being rated as a “sell” shows essentially, regardless of the price, however valued, it is being shown us a positive.

ree

(FactSet, 2025) - Valuation Ratings


Concentration and the AI boom. A handful of megacaps now account for about 40% of S&P 500 market value, with Nvidia alone roughly 8%, intensifying fragility to a single theme: AI monetization (Financial Times, 2025; Reuters, 2025). Bulls note AI capex plans are enormous and potentially rational if returns follow, but even sympathetic strategists warn that if growth slows the valuation air pocket is large (Goldman Sachs Asset Management, 2025).


“Is this 2008?” No. The 2008 crash began in highly leveraged housing and thin-capitalized banks. Today, U.S. large banks passed the 2025 Fed stress test, staying well above minimum capital even under a scenario with unemployment at 10% and steep asset-price declines (Federal Reserve, 2025; FT, 2025). Mortgage delinquencies have ticked up but remain moderate by historical standards at 4.04% in Q1 2025, with stress concentrated in FHA and VA segments, not across the entire market (MBA, 2025; Business Insider, 2025). That profile is not the broad, systemic deterioration of 2007–2008 (MBA, 2025).

ree

Positioning. Bank of America’s Global Fund Manager Survey shows cash balances back near cycle lows and risk appetite high, which usually precedes higher day-to-day volatility if macro data or guidance wobbles (Reuters, 2025). Berkshire Hathaway is a notable outlier: it has been a net seller for multiple quarters and reported about 344 billion of cash and equivalents at June 30, a war chest consistent with caution and patience (Reuters, 2025; FT, 2025).


2) What the indicators say (U.S., ASX, and global)


U.S. levels. Equities hover near all-time highs after strong Q2 earnings, but the forward multiple is above trend, market breadth is narrow, the VIX sits around mid-teens, and high-yield spreads are tight by history (FactSet, 2025; Cboe, 2025; FRED, 2025). Those are the classic preconditions for a routine 10% pullback if a catalyst appears.


Macro. Headline CPI rose 2.7% year-over-year in July and core CPI ran 3.1%. That mix keeps a September easing in play but limits the pace of cuts if services stay sticky (BLS, 2025; Barron’s, 2025). The 10s–2s yield curve has de-inverted and is hovering near flat to mildly positive, an ambiguous signal versus the deep inversions of 2022–2023 (FRED, 2025).


Australia. The ASX 200 has notched record closes in August as the RBA trimmed the cash rate to 3.60% with inflation trending into the 2–3% band (ABC News, 2025; RBA, 2025). Valuation is above its 5-year average on several measures, so further gains likely require earnings upgrades rather than rerating (RBA, 2025; Wilsons Advisory, 2025).


Housing and cost-of-living. U.S. median weekly earnings rose 4.6% year-over-year in Q2, outpacing headline inflation and keeping real income positive (BLS, 2025). In Australia, CPI rose 2.1% year-over-year in the June quarter and the RBA cut rates, but mortgage stress is still a headwind for discretionary spending (ABS, 2025; RBA, 2025). These dynamics favor a slower-growth, not a crisis, setup.

ree

3) What big investors do when they expect a correction


Institutions rarely go to 0% equities. They hedge, diversify, and trim cyclicality. Sell-side asset-allocation teams this year have stayed invested but neutral or underweight risk, and they explicitly recommend put spreads or more exotic downside protection when volatility is cheap (MarketWatch, 2025; Goldman Sachs, 2025; Reuters, 2025; Yahoo/Reuters, 2025). Berkshire has done the other thing institutions do when prices look full and opportunities scarce: let cash build and be selective. (Reuters, 2025). FMS Cash levels drop to record low in over 10 years, signalling fund managers do not see a scare in the market - at least not yet.


ree

4) What could cause the next correction


  1. Earnings disappointments in Big Tech. With ten companies around 40% of index value, any guide-down or AI ROI wobble can move the whole index (Financial Times, 2025).

  2. Policy shocks. A more hawkish Fed tone or slower-than-hoped rate-cut path would push up real yields and de-rate long-duration equities, particularly AI leaders trading at premium multiples (Barron’s, 2025).

  3. Tariffs and geopolitics. Tariff extensions and trade frictions can dent margins and raise inflation uncertainty, lifting discount rates and vol (Reuters, 2025).

  4. Credit re-pricing. High-yield spreads near cycle tights can gap wider if growth cracks; that typically coincides with equity drawdowns (FRED, 2025).

  5. Housing spillovers. Mortgage delinquencies are edging up in government-backed segments; a broader deterioration would impair consumption and bank risk appetite, though we are not there today (MBA, 2025; Business Insider, 2025).


5) How bad and when: scenarios, not guesses


Baseline (most likely): a 10–15% pullback within 3–9 months. Why: forward P/E above trend, narrow breadth, low vol, tight credit spreads, and an earnings season that leaves less room for error. Mild policy disappointment or a single mega-cap guide-down would be enough. Historically, such corrections occur roughly every year or two without a recession (Vanguard, 2025; FactSet, 2025). In this case, leadership broadens afterward and the index recovers within months if earnings keep compounding.


Downside (cyclical bear): 20–25% if growth slows and credit spreads widen materially while the Fed signals fewer cuts than priced. That combination usually forces multiple compression from 22x toward 18–19x even if earnings hold roughly flat (FRED, 2025; Barron’s, 2025).


Tail (low probability): 35–45% only if a systemic shock emerges. The clearest path would be a financial accident or hard landing that hits employment, housing, and funding simultaneously. Current stress-test outcomes and moderate household delinquency data argue this is unlikely near-term (Federal Reserve, 2025; MBA, 2025).


6) Managing wealth through a correction (playbooks by timeframe)


If you need cash in the next 12 months: keep 6–12 months of spending in cash or very short duration and plan rebalancing rules in advance. Acknowledge sequence-of-returns risk and avoid forced selling (Vanguard, 2025). Consider collars on concentrated positions where selling is tax-inefficient. Institutions frequently buy index put spreads when implied vol is low; that is a costly but effective crash insurance if sized modestly (Goldman Sachs, 2025).


If your horizon is 3–5 years: stay diversified, pre-commit to buying into weakness via rebalancing bands, and tilt toward quality balance sheets and free-cash-flow compounders. If you hedge, prefer defined-risk structures rather than outright long puts to reduce bleed, or pair equity risk with duration that tends to rally in growth shocks (AQR, 2021; Vanguard, 2025).


If your horizon is 10+ years: the biggest risk is behavioural. Missing the best market days has historically cut long-run returns dramatically, so the base plan is to stay invested and rebalance, not time tops (Vanguard, 2025). Use corrections to upgrade portfolio quality or tax-loss harvest.


Australia-specific notes: with the RBA easing and CPI ~2.1% y/y, rate-sensitive sectors can lead, but the index multiple is above average. Use weakness to add to quality banks and defensives but be disciplined on resources given China growth uncertainty (RBA, 2025; ABS, 2025; ABC, 2025; Reuters, 2025).


ree

7) What retail investors control, and the cost-of-living link


Retail flows can swing single names and short-term momentum, but institutions set the marginal price most days. Where retail has real control is behaviour: savings rate, asset allocation, fee discipline, rebalancing, and avoiding panic. Cost-of-living pressure cuts savings and forces some investors to sell into weakness; the antidote is pre-funded cash buffers and automatic contributions so you are a price-insensitive buyer when others must sell. In the U.S., real wages have been running ahead of inflation again since mid-2024, which is supportive for consumption; in Australia, inflation is back near target and rates are down, but mortgage stress still argues for conservative cash buffers (BLS, 2025; ABS, 2025; MBA, 2025).


ree
ree

Bottom line


A correction is likely in the next few quarters because the market’s resilience has pushed valuations and leadership to levels that need constant good news. The size of that correction hinges on just two things: whether AI leaders keep delivering, and whether policy avoids another inflation scare. Neither resembles 2008’s balance-sheet crisis. If you manage risk up front and stick to a rules-based plan, the odds favour compounding through the next downdraft rather than trying to sidestep it.

Related Posts

bottom of page